Rather Be Healthy

I was told, as 99% of other sufferers that I had multiple sclerosis which in the eyes of just about every conventional medical professional was an incurable disease.
In reality, an incurable disease is a disease that the medical professionals by way of the pharmaceutical industry say is incurable, or that they: big pharma haven’t found a drug that can fix it.
In reality, they aren’t and never have looked for a definitive way of genuinely healing any illness, let alone MS.
So, your choices are, according to them, to take the prescribed drugs that can ease one of the many symptoms.
What they don’t tell you is what the problem is or the scientifically proven side effects of the drugs that they, medical professionals that are supposedly looking out for your health.
Everyone knows what multiple means, so the sclerosis part?
According to Google;

Sclerosis: pathological hardening of tissue, especially from overgrowth of fibrous tissue or increase in interstitial tissue. also : a disease characterized by sclerosis. : an inability or reluctance to adapt or compromise.

My understanding of what was told to me by numerous neurologists is that an auto immune disease is basically a disease that the immune system is confused and in trying to protect you is attacking itself..

As I said, the NHS and every other conventional medical practice will only ever consider a form of treatment that is recommended by the pharmaceutical giants who in reality are not interested in anything but increasing their customer base and profits.

So after being diagnosed with MS, your genuine choices are to take the Dmd’s which as far as true health is concerned will do bugger all to help, or look for a genuine way of healing the body… Notice I said healing the body…  the Ann Boroch Protocol will do that,and not trying to cure MS, because the real problems have been caused by yeast, mould, gluten, dairy, and sugar.
These have exacerbated the rapid growth of Candida, which is the…
True problem…

I  have wanted to write a post on cholesterol for a while now especially after reading so much crap posted by so called experts in the field of health. If not daily then at least weekly there is another article condemning this much needed requirement for good health.

if makes me so mad to see misinformation in the media, be it TV, radio or the internet rammed down the throats of the uninformed public, it is so dangerous to constantly take statin drugs to lower cholesterol.

i know in this country (UK) and my previous home for 11 years the USA that the percentage of church goers is rapidly diminishing, however I think there is still a large population of believers in God. That being said let me ask you a question. “Do you  think God would have made mankind to be inherently faulty”. Well my thought is no he wouldn’t, so why are so many misinformed people screaming about something they know so little about. Cholesterol is natural, approximately 45% of it is made by the body.

A large percentage of the brain (25%) is cholesterol and 23% of the cell membrane of the red blood cells is cholesterol, without it they couldn’t flex and contort and get through the various capillaries which could then result in heart attack or stroke.Cholesterol.

Cholesterol is guilty by association, if you did a survey on the accidents in your local town you’d find that with every motor vehicle accident there is always an ambulance present. So if you take away the ambulance which is the common denominator would there be less accidents. Obviously not, but that is what’s happening with cholesterol.

Cholesterol is the second biggest natural detoxifier in the body, Albumin being the first. When you have toxins and contaminants in the body, Cholesterol is sent by your body to remove them. 

So by taking statin drugs to lower cholesterol you are just creating an environment in your body that allows the bad guys…toxins to run riot. The body can’t cope, you have a heart attack or stroke and the doctor claims that you addressed the problem too late. NO….what you did was remove the body’s own natural defense.

Cholesterol is not broken down into good and bad cholesterol or HDL and LDL. Cholesterol is there for a reason and there is HDL, LDL and VLDL or very low density lipoprotein and they all have a very specific role to play in the body.

LDL which is constantly being touted as bad cholesterol is actually very important, it combines with bilirubin in the blood to become bile which is then used to break down foods into digestible and absorbable components or to be excreted through feces or urine.

I doubt my little article will make a difference to the majority of people but if this can help one person then I’ll be happy.

I’f you find this useful you might enjoy my blog which is www.ratherbehealthy.com

Stefan Cairns.. 

I’d always…

Have you noticed that a much larger percentage of people these days are sick, even if it’s only that they are taking prescription or OTC drugs? The reason for this is twofold, Firstly its that 99% of non organic foods and drinks are loaded with taste enhancers and additives in general, and secondly, because of the symptom addressing drugs. So, these two are perpetuating the lines of customers.
Anyway, that’s what I believe everyone already knows but ignores.

I talked about blood tests and why the real problem when having them done, is not the actual blood test, but the way they are interpreted.
Sounds strange, yes!
When I worked for the late Dr. Hal Huggins we would analyse 34 components, there’s more but the 34 we looked at were deemed more relevant to genuine health.
Now this is where it gets difficult to describe, so bear with me.
Each one of them were listed as being within a certain range, what “They” do, as in conventional medical professionals is widen the range of what is acceptable because so many people are functioning badly because of the widespread use of non organic foods and pharmaceutical drugs. So, if we looked at Hematocrit, for instance, we would say an acceptable range was between 3 and 5, but “they” would say anywhere between 2 and 8 is perfectly fine because that’s what the majority of people were fitting into.
So, we’d see a person suffering from an illness, but had been told their BW was perfectly fine when Hematocrit was showing at 6.75.
Obviously, I’m using terminology that isn’t something used by medical professionals, just a way of explaining.
It wasn’t just Dr. Huggins that interpreted BW this way, but several others that understood the changes in how people had been affected in todays toxic pharmaceutical laden world.
I hope my explanation makes sense. Unfortunately, I don’t have a list of doctors that interpret correctly so when you are given results, I’d always ask questions…